|
|
The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute one of the
largest single group of drugs prescribed in Australia. They act primarily
as inhibitors of prostaglandin synthase but also have a number of other
activities including inhibition of neutrophil migration, mild immunosuppression,
and interference with cell membrane function. As well as being useful in
a wide range of inflammatory arthropathies, they may also be beneficial
in other types of pain such as renal colic, bone pain due to cancer and
in hypercalcaemia. Recent studies have also shown that NSAIDs may inhibit
tumour growth and the ability of tumours to metastasise in animal models,
and a recent paper has demonstrated that suldinac will reduce the rate of
growth of colonic polyps in humans.
Mean (SD) Plasma Half-Lives of Different NSAIDS
Drug Half-life (hr)
Short half-life
- Aspirin 0.25 0.03
- Diclofenac 1.1 0.2
- Flufenamic acid 1.4;9.0
- Ibuprofen 2.1 0.3
- Indomethacin 4.6 0.7
- Ketoprofen 1.8 0.4
- Tiaprofenic acid 3.0 0.2
Long half-life
- Diflunisal 13 2
- Naproxen 14 2
- Phenylbutazone 68 25
- Piroxicam 57 22
- Salicylate 2 - 15
- Suldinac (sulfide) 14 8
- Tenoxicam 60 11
The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs available in Australia, together
with their dose range and plasma half-life, are shown in Table 1 (1).
Although the plasma half-life is often used to differentiate NSAIDs, even
short half-life NSAIDs stay in tissues for considerably longer periods of
time and hence may be given less frequently than determined by their plasma
half-life. NSAIDs are produced in a number of different forms including
oral (standard, enteric-coated and slow release), suppositories, parenteral
preparations and recently available transcutaneous preparations. Transcutaneous
preparations may be useful for localised areas of pain such as bony metastases.
Certainly, in joint diseases significant concentrations are found within
a synovial joint over which the transcutaneous NSAID has been applied.
The major problem with NSAIDs is their adverse drug reactions which often
determine their acceptability by patients. Variability in response to NSAIDs,
both in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, is a reality but cannot be
explained simply in pharmaco-dynamic terms.
The major side effects of NSAIDs are shown in Table 2 (2) . Skin
rashes and abnormal liver function tests are usually mild and transient
but renal and gastric adverse events can be more severe.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be given very carefully to
any patients with underlying renal dysfunction, and this is particularly
important if the patient becomes dehydrated such as during an operative
procedure. Hypercalcaemian is another situation where a person might be
at risk from NSAID induced renal dysfunction.
Adverse Reactions to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
Gastrointestinal
- Peptic Ulceration
- Oesophagitis and strictures
- Small and large bowel erosive disease
Renal
- Reversible acute renal failure
- Fluid and electrolyte disturbance
- Chronic renal failure and interstitial fibrosis
- Interstitial nephritis
- Nephrotic syndrome
Cardiovascular
- Exacerbation of hypertension
- Exacerbation of angina
Hepatic
- Transaminitis
- Fulminant hepatic failure (rare)
Central nervous system
- Headache
- Drowsiness
- Confusion and behaviour disturbance
- Aseptic meningitis
Haematological
- Thrombocytopaenia
- Haemolytic anaemia
- Agranulocytosis and aplastic anaemia
Other
- Exacerbate asthma and nasal polyposis
- Skin rash
The whole of the gut might be affected by NSAIDs, whether it be reflux oesophagitis,
gastric or duodenal ulceration or ulceration in the small or large intestines.
The relative risk of developing a peptic ulcer when taking an NSAID varies
from approximately 2-5 but is significantly greater in elderly women, particularly
if they have co-morbidity such as renal dysfunction, heart failure, or a
pervious history of peptic ulceration. Over the last 12 months several papers
have suggested a hierarchy of NSAIDs in terms of adverse drug reactions,
as shown by Table 3 (3) from Langman, et al 1994.
Relative Risk of Peptic Ulceration from NSAIDs.
Drugs Ratio 95% Confidence Interval
- Ibuprofen 2.0 1.4 - 2.8
- Diclofenac 4.2 2.6 - 5.8
- Naproxen 9.1 5.5 - 15.1
- Indomethacin 11.3 6.3 - 20.3
- Piroxicam 13.7 9.1 - 25.3
- Ketoprofen 23.7 7.5 - 74.2
Care should be taken in interpreting some of these data with wide confidence
intervals but ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen were also noted as the
NSAIDs least likely to be associated with GI toxicity by Rodriguez et al
1994. 4
There is good evidence to show that the dose of NSAID is related to gastric
adverse events and thus the dose should be kept to a minimum. In patients
who have a previous history of gastric ulceration or who develop a GI side
effect while taking an NSAID, the following steps should be carried out:
- Ask, does the patient need the NSAID?
- If yes, then change the NSAID or lower the dose or add an H2 blocker
(for gastric ulceration).
- If duodenal ulceration is found, then misoprostil may be used. This
has the common dose related adverse event of diarrhoea (which may be useful
in patients on opioids).
- Reflux oesophagitis may be alleviated by a change of NSAID, co-prescribing
metoclopramide (Maxolon) or using cisapride (Prepulsid) or a proton pump
inhibitor such as omeprazole (Losec).
The variability in response to NSAIDs is a very real thing but it should
only take about a week to see if a patient is going to respond or not. If
they do not, then change the NSAID, starting with the maximum tolerated
dose. The dose of NSAID can sometimes be reduced by co-prescribing paracetamol
plus or minus codeine.
Indomethacin is particularly useful for hypercalcaemia (not usually in the
acute situation but for keeping the calcium down once it has been lowered).
Cerebral adverse events such as a feeling of unreality, giddiness, etc.
can occur with NSAIDs and, in particular, with indomethacin.
Used carefully, NSAIDs can be extremely beneficial in the management of
pain whether it comes from a joint or from bone pain associated with neoplasia.
With careful attention to dose and type of NSAID used, adverse events should
be kept to a minimum and reasonable pain relief provided to patients.
References:
- Brooks PM and Day RO. New England J Med 1991;324:1716
- Girgis L and Brooks PM. Drugs and Ageing 1994;4:101-102.
- Langman MJ et al. Lancet 1994;343:1075-1078.
- Garcia Rodriguez IA, Jick K. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
and perforation associated with individual NSAIDS. Lancet 1994;343:769-772.
Professor Peter Brooks
St Vincent's Hospital
University of New South Wales
Presented at the Education Meeting of May 25, 1994
Discussion
NSAIDS in Palliative Care
bill mcgrady, mcgradyw@bigplanet.com
Posted 24/2/99 8:21 PM
I am trying to design an experiment in fibroblasts cells. How can I arrive at an accurate dose rate in culture cells using NSAID's? I am going to compare COX1 and COX2 levels using different NSAIDS. Thank you for your time and effort.
|
Please send us your comment / tip
|